R.G. ex rel. F.G. v. New York City Department of Education
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, District Judge.
R.G. and C.G., individually and on behalf of F.G. (collectively “Plaintiffs”), seek relief against the New York City Department of Education (“DOE” or “Defendant”) pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. Plaintiffs contend Defendant failed to offer F.G., a child with special educational needs, a free appropriate public education program (“FAPE”) as guaranteed by IDEA. In particular, Plaintiffs contend Defendant violated federal and New York law by, among other things, convening an…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Forest Grove School District v. T. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Robert Walczak and Karen Walczak v. Florida Union Free School District and Maureen FlahertyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- R.E. Ex Rel. J.E. v. New York City Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Adams ex rel. T.J. v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Adams v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- D.S. v. Rockville Centre Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- E.V.E. v. Grossmont Union High School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023