Steven G. Lough v. Brunswick Corporation, D/B/A Mercury Marine
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Dissent 1
NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judge RADER joins, dissenting from the Order declining the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
In converting the factual question of experimental purpose into a matter of law, our court has cut another notch in the removal of patent issues from the trier of fact." The appellate/trial relationship is distorted in the panel’s treatment of'the factual question of whether this use of Mr. Lough’s engine seal assembly was primarily experimental and therefore not a “public use” in terms of § 102(b). The panel’s treatment is squarely in conflict with precedent.…
Also in this document: Dissent · Rader.
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.