Legal Opinion

Steven G. Lough v. Brunswick Corporation, D/B/A Mercury Marine

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 2, 1997No. 95-1266, 95-1302, 95-1314Published

1Dissent 1

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judge RADER joins, dissenting from the Order declining the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

In converting the factual question of experimental purpose into a matter of law, our court has cut another notch in the removal of patent issues from the trier of fact." The appellate/trial relationship is distorted in the panel’s treatment of'the factual question of whether this use of Mr. Lough’s engine seal assembly was primarily experimental and therefore not a “public use” in terms of § 102(b). The panel’s treatment is squarely in conflict with precedent.…

Also in this document: Dissent · Rader.

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API