In Re the Estate of Winslow
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Rulon, J.:
This is a will contest case. Claimant Richard O’Neill II appeals the district court’s interpretation of a residuary clause. The executor of the estate and the remaining residuary legatees, respondents, cross-appeal the court’s denial of attorney fees under K.S.A. 60-211 and K.S.A. 60-2007. We affirm.
The material facts of this case are essentially undisputed and are as follows:
Mary Isabel Winslow (decedent) executed a will in November 1992. The clause at issue, the residuary clause, reads:
“All the rest and residue of my estate I will, devise and bequeath, share and share alike, per…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Corbett v. SkaggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- In Re the Estate of WernetSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
- In Re Estate of SowderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Hesston Corp. v. KaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- Russell v. Estate of RussellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- NEA-Coffeyville v. Unified School District No. 445Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Telegram Publishing Co. v. Kansas Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Telegram Publishing Co. v. Kansas Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
- Jacobsen v. FlatheCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
- NEA-Coffeyville v. Unified School District No. 445Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000