Dillingham v. Dillingham
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MASSEY, Chief Justice.
Appeal is from the property division award pursuant to decree of divorce.
Affirmed.
Predicate for the material contentions of appellant, Walter Winford Dillingham, as against appellee Zexia Parmer Dilling-ham, lies in his belief that the trial court erred insofar as its judgment treated corporate assets, allegedly the separate property of appellant, as though it was community property and (in effect) because the court divided such corporate property equally between appellant and appellee.
No part of the property awarded to the wife, appellee, was real estate. Article…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hedtke v. HedtkeTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Ex Parte Winfield ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Mozisek v. MozisekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Grant v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
3Cited by42 opinions
- Hoffmann v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Zahra Spiritual Trust v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Simplot v. SimplotIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Speer v. QuinlanIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Zaruba v. ZarubaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.