Legal Opinion

Motley v. Williams

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 18, 2007No. 4248PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

Clarence Williams appeals the denial of his motion to set aside the master-in-equity’s settlement order. We affirm. 1

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This action emanates from a dispute involving a 9.68 acre parcel of land in Kershaw County. In 1987, Clarence Williams’ father contracted to sell the plot at issue to Anthony Motley’s father. In 2002, Motley brought suit against Williams seeking transfer of the title of the subject property. 2 In his complaint, Motley alleged he was entitled to relief under the theories of specific performance, part performance, and adverse possession. In response,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Staubes v. City of Folly BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Robert A. PETTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the TIMKEN CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  4. Ellie, Inc. v. MiccichiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Graham v. Town of LorisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vista Antiques & Persian Rugs, Inc. v. Noaha, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API