Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lord v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 29, 1995No. 90-1579Published

1DissentZehmer, C.J.

After carefully reviewing the voluminous record in this case, I am unable to agree with the majority that the state has proved the charge of first degree premeditated murder by legally sufficient circumstantial evidence. The state’s theory of events said to prove that Appellant Wiled her husband with premeditation is, in my view, inherently incredible and requires the fact-finder to impermis-sibly pyramid inference upon inference.

I

Appellant and her husband, Raddie Lord, were employees of the Department of Corrections. Appellant was charged with first degree murder arising out of the shooting…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. State v. LawSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Lynch v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  3. McArthur v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  4. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  5. Hogge v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API