Warsaw Waterworks Co. v. Village of Warsaw
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal from trial term, Wyoming county. Action by the Warsaw Waterworks Company against the village of Warsaw and others. From a judgment dismissing the complaint, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtHardin, P. J.
In chapter 394 of the Laws of 1869, incorporating the plaintiff, no exclusive privilege is, in terms, conferred upon the corporation there created to supply the village or its citizens with water. Power v. Village of Athens, 99 N. Y. 592, 2 N. E. 609; Syracuse Water Co. v. City of Syracuse, 116 N. Y. 167, 22 N. E. 381; In re City of Brooklyn, 143 N. Y. 596, 38 N. E. 983; Water Co. v. Easton, 121 U. S. 388, 7 Sup. Ct. 916; Colby University v. Village of Canandaigua, 69 Fed. 671; New Orleans Gaslight Co. v. Louisiana Light & Heat Producing & Manuf’g Co., 115 U. S. 650, 6 Sup. Ct. 252;…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lehigh Water Co. v. EastonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Louisville Gas Co. v. Citizens' Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
- White v. City of MeadvilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Syracuse Water Co. v. . City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Matter of City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- President of Colby University v. Village of CanandaiguaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1899
- Skaneateles Waterworks Co. v. Village of SkaneatelesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898