Legal Opinion

Steenis v. City of Appleton

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

A number of questions are raised upon the appeal. Plaintiffs contend that they have a right to show the true consideration for the conveyance; that the consideration was in fact an agreement to remove, restore, and maintain the log cabin as alleged in the complaint. We are unable to find in the complaint any allegation to the effect that the city of Appleton ever executed a contract in manner and form as required by law. The allegation of the complaint is that the city of Appleton approved the agreement dated September 20, 1935. The only agreement executed on September 20, 1935, is the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Maxcy v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Los Angeles County Pioneer Society v. Historical SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Fairbanks v. City of AppletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Los Angeles County Pioneer Society v. Historical SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API