Legal Opinion

Bebout v. Bebout

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 31, 1966No. 5-3980PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul Ward, Justice.

This litigation, relating to a division of property between man and wife, arose out of the factual situation presently summarized. Four separate stages of legal procedure between these parties preceded this appeal.

First. On May 16, 1961 the wife filed a suit for separate maintenance; the husband, on cross-complaint, asked for a divorce and one-half of all real and personal property, and then the wife asked for a divorce and a share of the property. On July 9, 1962 the trial court found the wife should have the homestead consisting of forty acres (held by the entirety) and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Deacon v. City of LadueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Cooper v. CooperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  4. Hudspeth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  5. Yancey v. YanceySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ramsey v. RamseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  2. Festinger v. KantorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. Standridge v. StandridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  4. Festinger v. KantorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API