Legal Opinion

Toerring v. Lamp

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 17, 1889PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Scott District Court. — Hon. Charles M. Waterman, Judge. Plaintiff seeks to have established as preferred certain claims for rent. The defendant asks to have certain indebtedness allowed as a set-off against the claim of plaintiff. Plaintiff’s claims were established, but the set-off asked was not allowed. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

There is no controversy as to the material facts of this case. August Wamebold died intestate on the twentieth day of August, 1887, and on *489the fifteenth day of October, 1887, Christian Toerring was duly appointed and qualified as administrator of his estate. In his lifetime Wamebold was the owner of the real estate involved in this action, and executed a lease thereof for the term of twenty years from the first day of March, 1875. By the terms of the lease the lessor was to receive an annual rental of nine hundred and fifty dollars, in equal quarterly payments, on the last days of May,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fry v. EvansNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  2. Knapp v. IsenbergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  3. Foteaux v. LepageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
  4. Hodgin v. TolerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  5. Winn v. MureheadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Reichard v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Herriott v. PotterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Pennock v. PennockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Iowa Railroad Land Co. v. Estate of BoyleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Johnson v. SiedelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API