City of Cincinnati v. Budget Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The questions before this court concern whether each of the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals relative to local subdivisions is arbitrary, unreasonable, or contrary to law, under the standards pronounced by this court in Bd. of Cty. Commrs. v. Budget Comm. (1946), 146 Ohio St. 636, 639-641 [33 O.O.108], and Bd. of Cty. Commrs. v. Willoughby Hills (1968), 14 Ohio St. 2d 163, 164 [43 O.O.2d 257]. For the reasons stated below, we find that two of the decisions below are not arbitrary, unreasonable, or contrary to law. We reverse those parts of the order below which required the inclusion of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Brooklyn v. Cuyahoga County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Board of County Commissioners v. Village of Willoughby HillsOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- City of Brook Park v. Cuyahoga County Budget Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
- Cuyahoga County v. Cuyahoga County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Russell Township v. Geauga CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Canton v. Stark County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- City of Cincinnati v. Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- City of Lima v. Allen County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Lima v. Allen Cty. Budget Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993