Legal Opinion

Clark v. Bank of Thomasville

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 12, 1918No. 9295PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Complaint; from Grady superior court — Judge Thomas. August 27, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.

1. A waiver of homestead is void if embraced in a promissory note infected with usury. Prather v. Smith, 101 Ga. 283 (28 S. E. 857); Cleghorn v. Greeson, 77 Ga. 343; Hancock v. Bank of Tifton, 6 Ga. App. 678 (65 S. E. 784).

2. The decisions of the Supreme Court of Georgia are binding as precedents upon this court, and clear and definite rulings on questions of law must be recognized and followed. It was held by the Supreme - Court in Angler v. Smith, 101 Ga. 844 (28 S. R. 167), that “the defense of usury is good even against a bona fide holder for value of a negotiable promissory note, who…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bailey v. LumpkinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846
  2. Clarke v. HavardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Atlanta Savings Bank v. SpencerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Weed v. Gainesville, Jefferson & Southern RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Cleghorn v. GreesonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Hotel Equipment Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API