Legal Opinion

Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Osting

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 16, 1999No. A99A1827PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

Osting and Morrison entered into a bailor-bailee agreement for storage of Morrison’s goods at Osting’s residence. While there, the goods were destroyed by fire. Osting’s homeowner’s insurance carrier, Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, sued for a declaratory judgment that its policy does not cover claims against Osting for loss of the property. The trial court held otherwise.

The insurer appealed in Ga. Farm &c. Ins. Co. v. Osting.1 Because the coverage issue turns on the question of whether Osting and Morrison intended their contract to directly relate to the insured…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re SpruellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. OstingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fowler v. City of Warm SpringsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API