Legal Opinion

Craig v. Wead

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1899No. 8941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error, from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Scott, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSuddivan, J.

Wead sued Craig to recover a broker’s commission claimed to have been earned in negotiating a sale of a city lot. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff, and judgment having been rendered on the verdict the defendant brings the record here for review.

The principal contention is that the evidence does not warrant a recovery. We think it does. It is conceded that defendant owned the property and listed it with the plaintiff for sale. That a sale was effected and the lot conveyed to Thomas, who afterwards deeded it to Frank, is established beyond controversy. But it is denied that Wead did…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Potvin v. Curran & ChaseNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Anderson v. CoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Butler v. KennardNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Seevers v. Cleveland Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Gilbert v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Ducummon v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  4. Lewis v. McDonaldNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Simms v. BoothDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API