Legal Opinion

Robins v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarry B. Frank, J.

Defendants, insurance companies, move for an order permitting the taking of a deposition of the wife of the deceased as a witness. Plaintiff cross-moves for summary judgment.

Apart from the question whether deceased’s wife may be examined as a witness, determination of both motions rests on the question whether a defense of material misrepresentation in the application and medical statement of the deceased is available to the insurer.

Defendants issued a joint group policy to the policy holder; the defendant Crosby Plans Corporation and the defendant bank is custodian in connection therewith.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Layman v. Continental Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Lucille Coleman v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Layman v. Continental Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Helfaer v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Cutler v. Hartford Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  4. Kribbs v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, Circuit Court of the 10th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Polk County1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API