Robins v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHarry B. Frank, J.
Defendants, insurance companies, move for an order permitting the taking of a deposition of the wife of the deceased as a witness. Plaintiff cross-moves for summary judgment.
Apart from the question whether deceased’s wife may be examined as a witness, determination of both motions rests on the question whether a defense of material misrepresentation in the application and medical statement of the deceased is available to the insurer.
Defendants issued a joint group policy to the policy holder; the defendant Crosby Plans Corporation and the defendant bank is custodian in connection therewith.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Layman v. Continental Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Lucille Coleman v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
3Cited by4 opinions
- Layman v. Continental Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Helfaer v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Cutler v. Hartford Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- Kribbs v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, Circuit Court of the 10th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Polk County1975