People v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HAMLIN, J.*
Defendant appeals from a judgment by the court convicting him of possession of marijuana for sale (Health & Saf. Code, *846§ 11359). The contraband was discovered in appellant’s motel room during a search conducted pursuant to a search warrant. Appellant contends the affidavit in support of the search warrant failed to provide probable cause to believe the marijuana was still in appellant’s motel room at the time the warrant was sought. We disagree.
Before examining this contention, we set forth the applicable legal principles and factual circumstances. It is established law that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. LawlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. MesaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. McDanielsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. McDanielsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. ShropshireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- State v. GrahamMontana Supreme Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.