Legal Opinion

Heiman v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1937No. 33,436PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

The state highway commission commenced proceedings to condemn lands for its purposes. From the award of the appraisers the landowners appealed to the district court, giving a bond to which no immediate objection was made. The appeal was tried and an award made by the jury. Thereafter, the highway commission filed two motions: one to dismiss the appeal for the reason the landowners had not given a bond conditioned as required by statute, the other for a new trial. The trial court denied the motion to dismiss and allowed the motion for a new…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edwards v. City of NeodeshaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  2. Marsol Credit Co. v. BlackerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  3. Clothier v. WallaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate of West v. WestSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  2. Singleton v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Kansas State Highway Commission v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  4. Western Light & Telephone Co. v. TolandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  5. Iverson v. Claim of ZabelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API