Heiman v. State Highway Commission
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Thiele, J.:
The state highway commission commenced proceedings to condemn lands for its purposes. From the award of the appraisers the landowners appealed to the district court, giving a bond to which no immediate objection was made. The appeal was tried and an award made by the jury. Thereafter, the highway commission filed two motions: one to dismiss the appeal for the reason the landowners had not given a bond conditioned as required by statute, the other for a new trial. The trial court denied the motion to dismiss and allowed the motion for a new…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Edwards v. City of NeodeshaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Marsol Credit Co. v. BlackerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- Clothier v. WallaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
3Cited by7 opinions
- Estate of West v. WestSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- Singleton v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- Kansas State Highway Commission v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- Western Light & Telephone Co. v. TolandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
- Iverson v. Claim of ZabelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.