Shapiro v. Pavlikowski
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This original proceeding in prohibition challenges respondent district court’s order denying petitioner’s motion to quash service of a summons and complaint, filed by respondent Coin-O-Matic and naming petitioner a party defendant. Petitioner, a resident of Arizona, contends that the district court lacks jurisdiction over his person. We agree.
The complaint below alleges that petitioner is indebted to respondent Coin-O-Matic in the sum of $69,084.91, for goods sold and delivered. Petitioner was served with process at his home in Arizona. He moved to quash service of process, arguing…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Certain-Teed Products Corp. v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1971
- McDermond v. SiemensNevada Supreme Court · 1980
4Cited by20 opinions
- Canadian Helicopters Ltd. v. WittigTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Laxalt v. McClatchyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1985
- Galatz v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- Priest v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1988
- Munley v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.