Legal Opinion
McMahon v. Butler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 27, 1980PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sweeney, J.
The primary action and the third-party action arise out of an automobile accident. Plaintiff was riding as a passenger in the automobile of third-party defendant-respondent Vollack (Vollack), which vehicle was involved in an accident with the automobiles of third-party plaintiff-appellant Butler (Butler) and third-party defendant-appellant Kocik (Kocik). Plaintiff was pushed forward on impact and injured her left knee when it struck the glove compartment. The Vollack vehicle was not equipped with seat belts. Butler served a third-party complaint and Kocik a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Spier v. BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Bolm v. Triumph Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Tedla v. EllmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Taft v. Shaffer Trucking, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
3Cited by16 opinions
- DiMauro v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Twohig v. BrinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Helmrich v. Eli Lilly & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Assante v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Quintel Corp. v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.