People v. Roche
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentTom, J.
Insofar as I conclude that, on the basis of this record, the trial court properly refused to give the charge of the affirmative defense of extreme emotional disturbance, I respectfully dissent. I find no basis to dispute that defendant, the killer, might have been emotional when he killed Lillian Rivera, his girlfriend. But I find no basis to conclude that his emotional state was so severely disturbed as set forth under prevailing law that he should have been able to avail himself of the defense at trial. Hence, I would affirm the judgment of conviction.
The People’s witnesses included…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- People v. PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. CasassaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. ButtsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. MoyeNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.