Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. Merrick

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 17, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNCAN, Justice.

This action arises from an oral contract entered into between appellant Lawrence and appellee Merrick.

Both parties admit that by the terms of the contract Merrick was to take possession of ten head of Lawrence’s cattle, provide their feed and receive 25 cents per pound for weight gained during the time they remained in Merrick’s possession.

The parties are in sharp disagreement concerning the period of time the cattle were to remain in appellee’s possession and the type of feed they were to receive during that period. Lawrence insists that they were to be kept for only a period…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Codell Construction Co. v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Collins' Adm'r v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  3. Louisville Railway Company v. KramerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Commonwealth for Use Benefit Eversole v. WestCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  5. Moore v. DeckerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Chandler Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  2. Stevens v. Chandler Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API