Legal Opinion
Gastelum v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 8, 2023No. 1:22-cv-01173Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No. 1:22-cv-01173-ADA-CDB 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 13 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILING TO PROSECUTE AND TO COMPLY 14 BED BATH & BEYOND, INC. WITH FED. R. CIV. PRO. 4(m) 15 Defendant. (Docs. 12, 13) 16 17 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum’s response to this Court’s Order 19 to Show Cause (OSC) why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to timely serve and file 20 summons returned executed consistent with…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Ann J. Malone v. United States Postal Service, an Agency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Henderson v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alphonso Thompson v. The Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.