Shipley v. City of Spearfish
South Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentColer, Justice
I agree with Justice Wollman that the res ipsa loquitur, instruction was properly submitted to the jury.
The majority opinion fails to take into account that, under the amended complaint, respondents sought $1,127.68 for specific damages under Counts I and III and an additional $5,000 for compensatory damages on the grounds of a private nuisance, Count II. These three theories were submitted under the instructions and the jury returned a general verdict for $4,627.68. A reversal on the basis of the res ipsa loquitur pleading and instruction does not dispose of at least $3,500 of the verdict…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schmeling v. JorgensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
- Barger v. ChelponSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- George W. Fassbinder v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- Orrison v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- Smith v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.