Legal Opinion

Arnold v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 22, 1992No. 91-1040PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Judge.

Arnold appeals from the trial court’s imposition of a habitual violent felony offender sentence, arguing that the trial court failed to make the necessary findings under the statute. See Jones v. State, 606 So.2d 709 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Because the trial court failed to make the finding *22specified at section 775.084(l)(b)(4), Florida Statutes (1989), that the predicate conviction had not been set aside, and because Arnold did not waive the requirement for this finding, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.

Arnold stipulated at sentencing that the requirements of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API