Legal Opinion

In re Cannon

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 1917No. 10,057PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Industrial Board of Indiana. Certified question of law. Proceedings under the Workmen’s Compensation Act in the matter of one Charles Cannon. Certified question of law by the Industrial Board.

1Opinion of the Court

Batman, J. —

Under the provisions of §61 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1915 (Acts 1915 p. 392), as amended by the act of 1917 (Acts 1917 p. 154), the Industrial Board has certified to this court a certain question of law, based upon the facts presented by a proceeding pending before that body, seeking the opinion of this court for guidance in determining such proceedings.

The statement of facts as submitted by the board is as follows: “On the 16th day of October, 1916, one Charles Cannon was in the employment of the Advance Bumely Company at an average weekly wage of $14.57; that on said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Northwestern Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  2. In re DentonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. In re MaranovitchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Kenwood Bridge Co. v. StanleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Inman v. Carl Furst Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Zee v. GarySupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  3. Lauritzen v. United States Reduction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. DipolitoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. In re HartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API