In re Amati
Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
PANEPINTO, Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Judicial Conduct Board (“Board”) filed a Complaint with this Court' on December 1, 2003 against District Justice Ronald Amati (“Respondent”). The Com- , plaint charges that Respondent has been convicted of felonies which constitute violations of Rule 2(A) of the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of District Justices . and Sections 17(b) and 18(d)(1) of Article V of the Pennsylvania Constitution and that, as a consequence, he is subject to discipline under Article V, § 18(d)(1) of the Constitution.
The Board and the Respondent have submitted stipulations…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re JoyceCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1998
- In Re StrockCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2003
- In Re KellyCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2000
- In Re SullivanCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2003
- In Re ZollerCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re MurphyCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2010
- In Re MurphyCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2010