Legal Opinion

Hanigan v. Hedstrom Concrete Products, Inc.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 23, 1994No. 93-1451PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

Thomas E. Hanigan was injured as a truck driver for Hedstrom Concrete Products, Inc. The question on appeal is whether the industrial commissioner correctly computed his loss of income for workers’ compensation benefits. The district court held that the computation was correct, and we agree.

Hanigan was an intermittent employee, working only when Hedstrom’s own truck drivers could not keep up with the work. .The injury occurred while Hanigan was delivering a load of Hedstrom’s products to Calgary, Canada. •

The parties stipulated most of the relevant facts and left for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. ErbeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  2. Miller v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jacobson Transportation Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. Area Education Agency 7 v. BauchSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  3. Mercy Medical Center v. HealyCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2011
  4. Jacobson Transportation Company And Liberty Mutual Insurance Vs. Russell HarrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  5. James Delire v. Key City Transport, Inc. and Great West Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API