Legal Opinion

Fowler v. Brantly

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 18, 1840PublishedCited by 25 opinions

IN error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Alabamá. In the Circuit Court of Alabama an action was instituted on a promissory note, by the plaintiff in error, against the defendants; and a- verdict and-judgment were entered for the defendants. The plaintiff took exception to the charge of the Court, and prosecuted this writ of error.

Read the full summary

IN error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Alabamá. In the Circuit Court of Alabama an action was instituted on a promissory note, by the plaintiff in error, against the defendants; and a- verdict and-judgment were entered for the defendants. The plaintiff took exception to the charge of the Court, and prosecuted this writ of error. The facts of the case, and the matters which .were the subjects of the exceptions taken to~the rulings of the Court, are fully stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Catron

This is an action of' assumpsit by the assignee of a note against the makers. The questions of law arising in this cause depend on the construction of a note of hand, in the following words:

“Selma, Dallas County, Alabama, March 1st, 1S36.
“ Eleven months after date, we, Harris Brantly, Peyton S. Graves, and Hugh Ferguson, jointly and severally, promise to pay Andrew Armstrong, cashier, or bearer, two thousand, dollars, value received, negotiable and payable at the Branch Bank of the state of Alabama, at Mobile. (Signed) Harris Brantly,

Peyton ,S. Graves,

Hugh Ferguson.

“Credit: Diego M‘Voy.

Harris…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Andrews v. PondSupreme Court of the United States · 1839

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Goodman v. SimondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Angle v. North-Western Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Swift v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Edwards v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  5. Bank of Pittsburgh v. NealSupreme Court of the United States · 1860

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API