Legal Opinion

Bellinger v. Town of Salisbury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 24, 1951PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: Defendant was entitled to inquire of plaintiff Bellinger on cross-examination whether he had “ received any moneys from Yurkewicz or any of his representatives or attorneys.” It was material on the question of damages. (Knapp v. Boche, 94 N. Y. 329; An ¿merman V. Utilities Oil Gorp., 222 App. Div. 481.) Exclusion of the evidence under the circumstances presents reversible error. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in a negligence action. The order denied a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Knapp v. . RocheNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Ammerman v. Utilities Oil Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Livant v. LivantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API