Legal Opinion

Lilleburg v. Coleman

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeche, J.

This suit is instituted as an action in boundary. It is not shown why plaintiff adopted this form of action, as it is in reality a petitory action to recover a strip of land measuring ten feet in width by one hundred and eighty-seven feet in depth, claimed to have been bought by him as an integral part of lot two in the village of Sunrise. The form of action, however, is not questioned. Defendant owns' lot one and occupies the strip in question as forming part of lot one. Defendant’s act of purchase includes these ■ ten feet according to, the description in his deed.

Both parties acquired from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Minor v. DaspitSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  2. Beatty v. BurkeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dufrene v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  2. Sharpless v. AdkinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Metrailer v. ByrdLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API