Legal Opinion
BMY, a Division of Harsco Corp. v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 2, 1988No. Civ. A. 88-536PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On January 29, 1988, the United States Army Tank Automotive Command (“TA-COM”) concluded a two-year negotiated procurement process by awarding a contract for variable reach, rough terrain forklift trucks to TRAK International. In this suit, plaintiff, an unsuccessful bidder for that contract, charges that the contract award was unlawful. Plaintiff asks the Court to suspend performance of that contract and to enjoin defendant from acting on it. Plaintiff also asks the Court to declare either that plaintiff was entitled to the contract award or that…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. John H. Shaffer, Administrator (Acting) of the Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Corel Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Friedler v. General Services AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Robert E. Derecktor of Rhode Island, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1991
- Saratoga Development Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991
- Elcon Enterprises, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.