Legal Opinion

Rostacher v. Rostacher

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

This is an action to annul a marriage on the ground of the subsequent insanity of one of the parties. The action is brought pursuant to an amendment to the Domestic Relations Law which was enacted in 1928 (§ 7, subd. 5).

Prior to that year it was well-settled law in this State that where one of the parties to a marriage was insane at the time it was entered into, the marriage could not be annulled at the suit of the spouse who was sane. Only the insane party or a relative of that person who had an interest to void the marriage could sue to have it annulled.

In Hoadley v. Hoadley (244 N. Y. 424)…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hoadley v. HoadleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dauge v. DaugeNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Angelo v. AngeloNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. In re the Accounting of WampflerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953
  4. Weiss v. WeissNew York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API