Legal Opinion

Maxson v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 5, 1990No. 87-01458PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, Judge.

This cause is before us on appeal from the final order below vacating a jury verdict on the ground that appellant was a borrowed servant precluded from suing the employer for negligence. We affirm.

Project Construction Company (PCC) entered into a contract with Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (AP & C) which required PCC to furnish manpower for certain AP & C projects. PCC paid the salaries, though AP & C was required to reimburse. PCC was also obligated to furnish its own supervisory personnel, and the contract provided that no PCC employee would be an AP & C employee.

Appellant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shelby Mutual Insurance Co. v. Aetna Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Crawford v. Florida Steel Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Rumsey v. Eastern Distribution, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Booher v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
  5. Cirnigliaro v. FLORIDA POLICE STANDARDS, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fleming Companies, Inc. v. MoreiraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Central Square Tarragon LLC v. Great Divide Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Coleman v. Mini-Mac Maintenance Service, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Parker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API