Legal Opinion
Morley v. Gory
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 31, 2002PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHester, J.
¶ 1 John Morley (“Appellant”) appeals pro se from the March 25, 2002 order sustaining the preliminary objections of James Gory and David Coward (“Appel-lees”) and dismissing the complaint. We affirm.
¶ 2 The trial court has outlined the factual and procedural history of this case as follows:
Appellant John H. Morley, Jr. alleged that Appellees James J. Gory and David L. Coward conspired to commit perjury and committed perjury during a three-day non-jury trial in November and December 2000 in the case of John H. Marley v. James J. Gory Mechanical, Inc., No. 95-01181 before the Honorable Ward F.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Post v. MendelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. FabinyiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Mistick, Inc. v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- LLMD of Michigan, Inc. v. Jackson-Cross Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Ginsburg v. HalpernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Audi AG and Volkswagon of America, Inc. v. D'AmatoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- C.G. v. J.H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Philadelphia Factors, Inc. v. Working Data Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Drew v. DavidsonNebraska Court of Appeals · 2003
- John Doe 203 v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.