Legal Opinion
Dome Petroleum Ltd. v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance of Wisconsin
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 2, 1991No. Civ. A. 84-97PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
The parties have cross-moved for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth herein, defendants’ motion is granted and plaintiffs’ motion is denied.
I. BACKGROUND
The factual basis of this case is set forth in detail in First Jersey Nat’l Bank v. Dome Petroleum Ltd,., 723 F.2d 335 (3d Cir.1983) (“Dome I”), and in Dome Petroleum Ltd. v. Employers Mutual Ins. Co. of Wisconsin, 767 F.2d 43 (3d Cir.1985) {“Dome II”). The Court will rely on and refer to the statements of facts in those opinions rather than repeat them here. The procedural posture of this case is,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hayman Cash Register Co. v. SarokinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Aetna Ins. Co. v. Gilchrist Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Liberty International Underwriters Canada v. Scottsdale InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Motor Club of America v. WeatherfordDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- APOLLO UNDERWRITING LTD. v. PATS & SONS GENERAL CONTRACT LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022