Legal Opinion

Panhandle Refining Co. v. Swope

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 20, 1922No. 1325PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarper, C. J.

December 15, 1917, E. L. Swope and wife, Ola, executed to W. E. Norton the following lease (as applicable to the questions raised upon appeal):

“ * * * For and in consideration of $83.15 cash * * * and of the covenants and agreements hereinafter contained on the part of lessee, to be paid, kept and performed have granted, conveyed, demised, leased and let and by these presents do grant, convey, demise, lease and let unto said lessee for the sole and only purpose of mining and operating for oil and gas * * * all that certain tract of land * * * [describing the land).
“It is agreed that this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chicago, Texas & Mexican Central Railway Co. v. TitteringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Moore v. CrossTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Sanborn v. MurphyTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Minter v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. A. F. Buchanan and Wife, Celeste Buchanan v. Sinclair Oil & Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  2. Tripplehorn v. Ladd-Hannon Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Ebberts v. Carpenter Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Anderson v. WiseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Dickson v. DayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API