Legal Opinion
Nardelli v. Metropolitan Group Property & Casualty Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 1, 2012No. 1 CA-CV 10-0350PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORRIS, Judge.
¶ 1 This appeal and cross appeal arise out of a lawsuit filed by Plaintiffs/Appellants/Cross-Appellees, Kenneth and Tammy Nardelli (“the Nardellis”), against Defendants/Appellees/Cross-Appellants, Metropolitan Group Property and Casualty Insurance Company and Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company (collectively “Met-Life”), for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. After a jury awarded the Nardellis $155,000 in compensatory damages and $55 million in punitive damages, the superior court upheld the jury’s award of compensatory…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Linthicum v. Nationwide Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Orca Communications v. Ann Noder Et vir/pitch PublicArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- Temple v. Hartford InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2014
- Arellano v. Primerica Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Barten v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2014
- Newman v. Select Specialty Hospital-Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.