Schlicker v. Gordon
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Moniteau Circuit Court, Hon. E. L. Edwards, Judge. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court. I. The jurisdiction of the circuit court to hear and determine all questions arising on the motion for judgment in this case is well settled. 8chlicker v. Gordon & Finite, 74 Mo. 534. Defendants were authorized to make any defence under the general denial which the facts in evidence justified. Wolf v. Schaeffer, 4 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Moniteau Circuit Court, Hon. E. L. Edwards, Judge. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court. I. The jurisdiction of the circuit court to hear and determine all questions arising on the motion for judgment in this case is well settled. 8chlicker v. Gordon & Finite, 74 Mo. 534. Defendants were authorized to make any defence under the general denial which the facts in evidence justified. Wolf v. Schaeffer, 4 Mo. App. 367; Wheeler v. Billings, 38 N. Y. 263; Bliss on Code Pleading, sect. 327. II. It is also well settled that whatever may be the form of the note, it…
1Opinion of the CourtPhilips, P. J.
I. This cause has been in the supreme court of this state on appeal taken by the defendants, and is reported in 74 Mo. 534. It appears from the opinion therein that the judgment was reversed solely on the ground of the error committed by the trial court in refusing a certain instruction asked by the defendants. On the re-trial of the case in the circuit court, this instruction, with those given on the former trial, was conceded to the defendants. On this trial, however, defendants requested other instructions, and *483the principal error complained, of on this appeal is the imputed error of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. HardinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Kritzer v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855
- Carson v. CummingsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- Anderson v. ShockleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Acock v. AcockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Clark v. HillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
- Boggess v. BoggessSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Koontz v. KaufmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
- Wiseman v. St. Louis, Arkansas & Texas Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1888
- Clay v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.