Legal Opinion

Young v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 9, 1992No. 90-2186PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FARMER, Judge.

In understandable frustration with the defendant’s refusal to accept the services of his third appointed counsel to represent defendant at his first-degree murder trial, the trial judge refused a new appointment of counsel and also refused an eleventh-hour continuance of the already much delayed trial, thereby requiring defendant to represent himself with only a “stand-by” lawyer to advise him. Unfortunately, and despite the prosecution’s suggestion to do so, the judge failed to conduct a Faretta hearing. See Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Kleinfeld v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. DiBartolomeo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. Crutchfield v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API