Legal Opinion

Van Natta v. Van Natta

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1919No. 23,240PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Clinton Circuit Court; Joseph Combs, Judge. Action for divorce by Helen S. Van Natta against Samuel G. Van Natta. From a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLairy, J.

— This was an action brought by the appellee, Helen S. Van Natta, in the Tippecanoe Circuit'Court, against the appellant, Samuel G. Van Natta, seeking a divorce, alimony, custody of their only child, and compensation for her attorneys. The cause was taken to the Clinton Circuit Court on change of venue and there tried by the court. The trial court found for appellee upon the issues made, and rendered judgment dissolving the bonds of matrimony between appellant and appellee, granting the appellee a divorce from appellant, giving the care and custody of their, child to appellee, and awarding…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yost v. YostIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. SchombergIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Hedrick v. HedrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Watts v. WattsIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Loeb v. LoebIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Griffith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. State ex rel. GaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Dieterle v. DieterleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API