Legal Opinion

Rinaldi v. Rodzik

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 14, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action of contract to recover damages for breach of a written agreement. The agreement as written described the plaintiffs as party of the first part and "Kristina and Ludrius Rodzik ... of the second part.” Among its terms "the party of the second part” agreed "to purchase a certain estate situated at the Shrewsbury” and to pay therefor certain sums in 'cash, take the estate subject to a specified mortgage and "the remainder ... to. be paid by the note of the party of the.second part ... secured by a power of sale mortgage, in the usual form, upon the said premises, such note to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co. v. BaconMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  2. Belisle v. BarryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co. v. BaconMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. WorshamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Famigletti v. NeviackasMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API