Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Haft v. Tod

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 28, 1924No. Nos. 276, 282PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, Circuit Judge.

In view of the opinion of Judge Winslow in the Brugnoli Case,, it is necessary to discuss only the single question which we think merits consideration. It is entirely plain, as pointed out in the opinion below, that relator has never become a public charge, and is not likely to become a public charge, and all this has been affirmatively demonstrated in relator’s favor. There is thus left only the question as to whether relator, at the time of entry, was a member of one or more of the classes excluded by law.

Section 3 of the Act of February 5, 1917 (Comp. St. 1918, Comp.…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Casa De Maryland, Incorporated v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States Ex Rel. Powlowec v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  3. Nocchi v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1925
  4. United States ex rel. Casimano v. Commissioner of ImmigrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  5. HARUTUNIANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API