Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Millnul Associates
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 13, 1984No. 83-1029PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
443 So.2d 485 (1984)
Samuel HAMILTON, Appellant,
v.
MILLNUL ASSOCIATES, a Partnership under the Laws of the State of New Jersey, and Henry D. Mayer, Individually, Appellees.
No. 83-1029.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
January 13, 1984.
Stephen J. Powell of Arky, Freed, Stearns, Watson & Greer, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.
Elvin W. Phillips of Lawson, McWhirter & Grandoff, Tampa, for appellees.
LEHAN, Judge.
We affirm the lower court's order of dismissal without prejudice and hold that a voluntary dismissal followed by a dismissal for lack of prosecution is without prejudice to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crump v. Gold House RestaurantsSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- McDaniel v. OnkeyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
3Cited by5 opinions
- CPI Mfg. Co. v. Industrias St. Jack's, SADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Southeast Mortg. Co. v. SinclairDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Pettijohn v. Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Jackson v. LayneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Johnston v. LenowitzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992