Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Invest Almaz v. Temple-Inland

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided February 8, 2000No. CV-97-374-JMPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Invest Almaz v. Temple-Inland CV-97-374-JM 02/08/00 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Invest Almaz v. Civil No. 97-374-JM Opinion No.

2000 DNH 037

Temple-Inland Forest Products Corporation MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This case arises out of the unsuccessful attempt by Plaintiff Invest Almaz, a Russian corporation, to purchase the equipment housed in a manufacturing plant located in Claremont, New Hampshire. Invest Almaz acted through Pathex International Ltd., its partner in a joint venture formed to acquire manufacturing equipment that could be transported to Russia.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Maury A. Ryan, D/B/A Ryan, Klimek, Ryan Partnership v. Royal Insurance Company of America, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. Omnibank of Mantee v. United Southern BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Petrie-Clemons v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. Terrydale Liquidating Trust v. BarnessDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  5. Cohen v. Frank Developers, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API