Legal Opinion

People v. Stone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 2, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously *981affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in denying his suppression motion. The court properly concluded that defendant was not in custody when he was questioned at the hospital waiting room about the victim’s injuries. Such “noncustodial questioning of a witness is investigative in nature and does not require that the Miranda warnings be given” (People v Stokley, 134 AD2d 542, lv denied 70 NY2d 960; see, People v Hurley, 154 AD2d 617). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Steuben County…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. HurleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. People v. StokleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SorokaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. People v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. People v. GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API