Legal Opinion

Diansky Rouzard v. LinkedIn Corporation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 16, 2025No. 3:25-cv-09072Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION DIANSKY ROUZARD, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:24-cv-2270-JSS-LHP LINKEDIN CORPORATION, Defendant. ___________________________________/ ORDER Defendant, LinkedIn Corporation, moves to transfer this case to the Northern District of California pursuant to the forum selection clause in its user agreement. (Dkt. 48.) Plaintiff, Diansky Rouzard, proceeding pro se, opposes the motion. (Dkt. 50.) Upon consideration, for the reasons outlined below, the court grants the motion to transfer. BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges that he is an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. United States v. Sineneng-SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  3. Nettie Effron v. Sun Line Cruises, Inc. And Sun Line Greece Special Shipping Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. Krenkel v. Kerzner International Hotels Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  5. P & S Business MacHines Inc. v. Canon Usa, Inc., Canon Computer Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API