Legal Opinion

Hempel v. Ihrig

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1969No. 39897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs Hempel and Boyd instituted separate actions against defendants Ihrig, alleging damage to plaintiffs’ crops as a result of defendants’ trespassing cattle and hogs. The actions were consolidated, tried to the court and judgment was rendered for each plaintiff.

Plaintiff Hempel recovered the sum of $2,000 for damages sustained in the year 1965 and the sum of $1,000 for damages suffered in 1966. The latter figure was trebled under the authority of RCW 16.12.020.1

Plaintiff Boyd recovered $1,000 for the crop damage experienced in 1965 and $1 for the losses sustained in 1966.

Defendants’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Lewis v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State v. MercyWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. City of Seattle v. SchafferWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Kreger v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weiss v. WeissWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Calistro v. Spokane Valley Irrigation District No. 10Washington Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Scruggs v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API