Legal Opinion

California Prune & Apricot Growers, Inc. v. Baker

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1926No. Docket No. 5070PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCashin, J.

An action by a co-operative marketing asso-' eiation 'to recover liquidated damages for the breach of contracts providing for the sale and delivery to the plaintiff of certain crops of prunes by defendants, who were members of the association.

The association therein agreed to pay therefor a fixed minimum price per pound upon delivery, the contracts further providing as follows:

“The buyer (plaintiff) agrees to use its best efforts to resell said prunes, together with similar prunes from other sellers, at net prices higher than those paid to the sellers (defendants) upon delivery thereof, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. ByersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Van Buskirk v. KuhnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Front Street, Mission & Ocean Railroad v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. PerrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Southern Pacific Railroad v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goodfellow v. GoodfellowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Andrews Farms v. Calcot, Ltd.District Court, E.D. California · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API