E.A. Nord Co. v. State, Department of Labor & Industries (In Re E.A. Nord Co.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SAMUEL J. STEINER, Bankruptcy Judge.
FACTS AND ISSUES
The facts are not in dispute. Under Title 51 of the Revised Code of Washington employers are required to provide workman’s compensation coverage for employees. This obligation may be satisfied either by qualifying as a self-insurer or by making compulsory contributions to the Washington State Industrial Insurance Fund. From January of 1974 until December of 1985 the debtor was certified by the State as a self-insurer. After decertification, the debtor was required to post a bond.
This Chapter 11…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Lorber Industries Of California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- In re FarrellDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1914
3Cited by11 opinions
- New Neighborhoods, Inc. v. West Virginia Workers' Compensation FundCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- In Re Karen Lee Camilli, Debtor. Industrial Commission of Arizona v. Karen Lee CamilliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- In Re National Steel Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Seidle v. United States (In Re Airlift International, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1989
- Camilli v. Industrial Commission (In Re Camilli)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.