Rush v. First Nat. Bank of Amarillo
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtHendricks, J.
The appellee, by an additional brief and argument in this case, is vigorously insisting that we committed serious' error in the former disposition of this case.
First As to our construction of the judgment in favor of the First National Bank being based upon the open account instead of upon the note, and that certain language in another portion of the judgment is a significant indication that the judgment was based upon the note and not the open account, ap-pellee says: “This judgment, which we must construe as an entirety, * * * disposes of the whole matter and gives the bank judgment for the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Petrakion v. ArbeelyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
3Cited by2 opinions
- Groves v. WhittenbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Groves v. WhittenbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914