Legal Opinion

Rush v. First Nat. Bank of Amarillo

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 1, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHendricks, J.

The appellee, by an additional brief and argument in this case, is vigorously insisting that we committed serious' error in the former disposition of this case.

First As to our construction of the judgment in favor of the First National Bank being based upon the open account instead of upon the note, and that certain language in another portion of the judgment is a significant indication that the judgment was based upon the note and not the open account, ap-pellee says: “This judgment, which we must construe as an entirety, * * * disposes of the whole matter and gives the bank judgment for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Petrakion v. ArbeelyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Groves v. WhittenbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Groves v. WhittenbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API